Re: "Rap against conservatives was dishonest," by Ron Kazen from the May 10th edition of the Augusta Chronicle editorial page.
Not only did Mr. Ryan allow this letter on his editorial page, but it was the featured letter of the day.
Ron Kazen wrote a rebuttal to a letter published in the Chronicle about a week earlier that had been written by Kevin Palmer. Here is the quote that is nothing other than a personal attack.
"He (Kevin Palmer) needs to reflect on his diatribe and consider retaining friends of a higher social caliber than with whom he apparently associates."
What an outrage! Because he has a different political philosophy than Mr. Kazen, supposedly he associates with low lifes?
The rest of Kazen's letter falsely accuses Mr. Palmer of racism, Marxism, and promoting racial divisiveness.
It should not have been published, let alone featured.
**********************************************************************************
This was actually a slow week. Last week, I didn't comment on an editorial from that week in which Mr. Ryan accused those of opposing the new discriminatory anti-immigrant law of being emotional while those in favor of it being rational.
Oh yeah, that's right. If you disagree with me, you're being emotional.
I did actually read the law and it's pretty stupid. Obviously, it was written to oppress hispanics. But besides that, it's just a bad law. Arizona orders local law enforcement agents not to refrain from enforcing existing federal law. So the police are ordered to enforce an unenforceable law. If it's proven to be already unenforceable, how are they going to enforce it? Will passing a state law repeating a federal law make it more enforceable? I doubt it.
But that's not even the stupidest part of this law. Arizona invited private parties to sue government parties for not enforcing the unenforceable law. Considering how state's are already strapped for money, this sets an incredibly bad precedent that will lead to mountains of frivolous lawsuits. Plus the constitutionality of the law will be challenged in courts. Can anyone say bankruptcy caused by legal fees.
*******************************************************************************
Rick Mckee drew a couple of stupid cartoons this week.
On Friday May 14th a cartoon compared Obama's health care reform with the oil spill.
McKee has given the health care reform bill a whole month before calling it a disaster. What a race to judgement.
In today's (May 15th) cartoon he shows the media blaming Bush for the oil spill, as if that's some kind of joke.
A week of testimony at capital hill clearly illustrates that Halliburton cut corners, thus contributing to the oil spill disaster. In secret meetings with Dick Cheney the oil companies wrote rules later put in by the Bush administration so that standards were relaxed and shortcuts were allowed. Bush is at fault. Rational people don't need the media to inform us of this fact.
BTW, Obama is also at fault. It is his administration that is continuing the bad environmental policies of the Bush administration, and they're the ones who approved the permit for this ill-fated oil rig.
********************************************************************************
Re: "First Grade? No, first rate!" from the May 15th edition of the Augusta Chronicle editorial page.
Mr. Ryan needs to stick to English, not Yiddish. He misused the Yiddish word, chutzpah, in the subtitle, "Hephzibah teacher Kristi Davis shows chutzpah in protecting kids."
Chutzpah is not a synonym for courage. Chutzpah means gall. As in someone offering $250 for a car worth $10,000. Nobody would call that brave. The car dealer might say, "that guy has a lot of gall," but he would never call him courageous.
Misusing a foreign language shows embarrassing ignorance.
Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Michael Ryan was for the National Consumption Tax Before He was Against It
Re: "A huge step backward," from the April 25th edition of the Augusta Chronicle editorial page.
I can't believe this one. For at least a decade the Augusta Chronicle editorial page has written strong opinion pieces in favor of a National Sales Tax. They come up with propaganda favoring a national consumption tax on average about once a month, so they've printed an estimated 120 unsigned editorials in favor of the National Sales Tax.
In this column Mr. Ryan opposes a Value Added Tax, or VAT, which is the same thing as a consumption tax, but with a realistic closure of black market loopholes.
I agree with Mr. Ryan that a VAT would "suffocate" the economy (as would the consumption tax he's been in favor of for years).
Why would he be in favor of a consumption tax but opposed to a VAT when they're virtually the same thing?
Because democrats are in charge, and some may be in favor of this. So he's pretty much against it now because democrats might favor it. This is just like the health care reform bill that recently passed. It consisted of mostly republican ideas, but conservatives and republicans were against it because democrats were for it.
In any case there's no way a VAT would pass now. President Obama would never support this piece of political suicide, and the Senate did some kind of straw poll that showed 84 of them opposed it.
There was no need to comment on this, but Mr. Ryan did--I guess so he can illustrate his hypocrisy again.
***********************************************************************************
Re: "Cue the outrage," from the April 27th edition of the Augusta Chronicle editorial page.
Mr. Ryan likens the outrage over the passage of Arizona's new racist anti-immigration law with President Obama's defense of Henry Gates, when this African-American professor was arrested for no reason.
Supposedly, President Obama was somehow in error when he accused the policeman of stupidity.
Guess what--Obama was right. Gates was never convicted of any crime. The policeman was wrong.
And people are right to be outraged over Arizona's new law which legalizes racism. It gives police the right to harrass people because of their skin color. This is something that's unbelievable in this day and age.
But Mr. Ryan supports it.
His support for a racist law makes him a...racist.
Mr. Ryan brings up a poll that shows 70% of the people in the state support the law. So what? Even higher percentages of people in the south opposed desegregation back in the 1960's. That didn't make it right.
BTW, don't forget, Arizona was also the last state to make MLK day a holiday.
I can't believe this one. For at least a decade the Augusta Chronicle editorial page has written strong opinion pieces in favor of a National Sales Tax. They come up with propaganda favoring a national consumption tax on average about once a month, so they've printed an estimated 120 unsigned editorials in favor of the National Sales Tax.
In this column Mr. Ryan opposes a Value Added Tax, or VAT, which is the same thing as a consumption tax, but with a realistic closure of black market loopholes.
I agree with Mr. Ryan that a VAT would "suffocate" the economy (as would the consumption tax he's been in favor of for years).
Why would he be in favor of a consumption tax but opposed to a VAT when they're virtually the same thing?
Because democrats are in charge, and some may be in favor of this. So he's pretty much against it now because democrats might favor it. This is just like the health care reform bill that recently passed. It consisted of mostly republican ideas, but conservatives and republicans were against it because democrats were for it.
In any case there's no way a VAT would pass now. President Obama would never support this piece of political suicide, and the Senate did some kind of straw poll that showed 84 of them opposed it.
There was no need to comment on this, but Mr. Ryan did--I guess so he can illustrate his hypocrisy again.
***********************************************************************************
Re: "Cue the outrage," from the April 27th edition of the Augusta Chronicle editorial page.
Mr. Ryan likens the outrage over the passage of Arizona's new racist anti-immigration law with President Obama's defense of Henry Gates, when this African-American professor was arrested for no reason.
Supposedly, President Obama was somehow in error when he accused the policeman of stupidity.
Guess what--Obama was right. Gates was never convicted of any crime. The policeman was wrong.
And people are right to be outraged over Arizona's new law which legalizes racism. It gives police the right to harrass people because of their skin color. This is something that's unbelievable in this day and age.
But Mr. Ryan supports it.
His support for a racist law makes him a...racist.
Mr. Ryan brings up a poll that shows 70% of the people in the state support the law. So what? Even higher percentages of people in the south opposed desegregation back in the 1960's. That didn't make it right.
BTW, don't forget, Arizona was also the last state to make MLK day a holiday.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)